Colorado’s Ken Buck Among Republicans Objecting During Trump’s Impeachment Hearing

(CBS4/CNN) — The House Judiciary Committee held its second impeachment hearing Monday and it was marked with repeated objections from Republicans, including Colorado’s Ken Buck. It is the first hearing since Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the House will go ahead with articles of impeachment.

Republicans interrupted on a number of points of order as experts made their legal cases.

“But typically we administer oaths before opening statements… for witnesses, for witnesses,” Buck stated.

U.S. Rep. Ken Buck (D-CO) (credit: CBS)

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler on Monday accused President Donald Trump of putting “himself before country.”

“If he puts himself before the country in a manner that threatens our democracy, then our oath — our promise to the American people — requires us to come to the defense of the nation,” Nadler, a Democrat from New York, said in his opening statement at a Judiciary Committee hearing to hear the evidence on impeachment against the president.

Republicans shot back that Democrats were rushing to impeach Trump in order to beat him in the 2020 election, forcefully objecting to the impeachment hearing while throwing up procedural objections to the process that Nadler dismissed.

“This may though become known as the focus-group impeachment,” said Rep. Doug Collins of Georgia, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee. “Because we don’t have a crime, we don’t have anything we can actually pin and nobody understands really what the majority is trying to do except interfere and basically make sure they believe the President can’t win next year if he’s impeached.”

RELATED: House Investigators Present Arguments For And Against Impeachment 

The objections to the hearing began as soon as Nadler started his opening statement, as a protester in the audience shouted down the Judiciary Committee chairman before being removed by US Capitol Police. Republicans on the committee then took up their own objections, demanding a hearing for the witnesses they want to hear from and accusing Nadler of “a steamroll” when he ignored their protests. Republicans even forced Democrats to make a motion to recess the hearing, prompting a roll-call vote to take a 15-minute break.

Collins knocked Democrats for not having House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, a California Democrat who led a series of impeachment hearings in his committee, testify before the Judiciary panel, as Intel’s counsel will be present and answer questions at Monday’s hearing. Rep. Devin Nunes of California, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, was seated behind the Republican counsel for the start of Monday’s hearing, while Republicans displayed a poster with Schiff’s face on a milk carton in a further attempt to needle the Intelligence chairman.

Monday’s hearing is intended to give Democrats the chance to make their case against the president as they push forward on an impeachment vote that could take place before Christmas, while Republicans are mounting a vigorous defense of the President and protest how Democrats have handled the impeachment proceedings. It’s likely to be the final public hearing before Democrats take up articles of impeachment in the Judiciary Committee later this week.

Staff present case for and against Trump

The diametrically opposing views between Democrats and Republicans on impeachment — where they have failed to agree on basic facts and what they mean — underscores the intense partisan fight that’s continued to escalate as an impeachment vote has drawn closer.

Presenting the Democrats’ case, House Judiciary Committee counsel Barry Berke described a pattern of Trump’s behavior dating back to his call for Russia to find Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s emails during the 2016 election.

“Given what happened with the Department of Justice investigation, given what’s happening here, if in fact President Trump can get away with what he did again, our imagination is the only limit to what President Trump may do next or what a future president may do next to try to abuse his or her power to serve his own personal interest over the nation’s interest,” Berke said.

The House Intelligence Committee’s Democratic counsel Daniel Goldman walked through the committee’s investigation during his presentation, laying out the Democratic case that Trump directed the effort for Ukraine to investigate his political rival while withholding US security aid and a White House meeting.

Rep. Neguse questioned Goldman.

“In fact, isn’t it true that none of the witnesses that appeared before your committee testified in support of the theory that Ukraine somehow interfered in our elections. Is that right Mr. Goldman?”

Goldman replied, “That is absolutely correct.”

Goldman said that senior officials were all “in the loop” about the effort, as US Ambassador Gordon Sondland testified, and he argued Trump’s “determination to solicit of foreign interference in our election continues today.”

“It did not end with Russia’s support for Trump in 2016, which President Trump invited by asking for his opponent to be hacked by Russia,” he said. “And it did not end when his Ukrainian scheme was exposed in September of this year.”

Republican counsel Steve Castor laid out his own pattern — one that he says shows the Democrats were working to impeach the President since the day he took office. Castor pointed out all of the Democratic investigations into the President across the House committees, from the testimony of Michael Cohen to the lawsuit to obtain the President’s tax returns, to argue the impeachment inquiry has been long in the making.

“The record in the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry does not show that President Trump abused the power of his office or obstructed Congress,” Castor said. “To impeach a president who 63 million people voted for over eight lines in a call transcript is baloney.”

Rep. Ken Buck questioned Castor.

“The majority report on page 13 says the U.S. intelligence community had unanimiously determined Russia, not Ukraine, had interfered with the 2016 election to help the candidacy of President Trump. Mr. Castor, it appears to to be a conflict there. President Trump is asking Ukraine to investigate something the majority has decided is an illegitimate request because there was no interference in an election by Ukraine. Is that how you read this?,” Buck asked.

“Yes sir,” Castor replied.

Castor argued that Democrats provided “no direct evidence that President Trump withheld a meeting or security assistance in order to pressure President Zelensky to investigate former VP (Joe) Biden.”

“Witnesses who testified in the inquiry have denied having awareness of criminal activity or even an impeachable offense,” he said. “On the key question of the president’s state of mind, there is no clear evidence that President Trump acted with malicious intent.”

Debating what to do about Mueller

While House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and senior Democrats have made clear they are proceeding on impeachment, House Democrats are still debating whether the articles should narrowly focus on Ukraine or to expand the scope of the articles to include the allegations detailed by Mueller.

As Democrats debate including Mueller’s evidence, Trump’s conduct as detailed in the special counsel’s report was part of the discussion on Monday.

Still, Schiff seemed to indicate he did not support including the Mueller allegations in the impeachment articles.

“In a charging decision — and an impeachment in the House is essentially a charging decision — to charge those that there’s the strongest and most overwhelming evidence, and not try to charge everything even though you could charge other things,” Schiff said Sunday on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

“There is overwhelming evidence the President sought to coerce Ukraine into interfering in our election, essentially sought to cheat in our next election by getting a foreign government to weigh in,” Schiff added. “That is a very serious business and it imperils our national security, it’s a gross abuse of his office and the President also deeply sought to obstruct the investigation into that wrongdoing, and I think that is the gravamen of this offense here.”

The White House on Friday said it would not participate in the Judiciary Committee proceedings, telling the committee in a letter Friday the impeachment inquiry was “completely baseless” and a “reckless abuse of power.”

Trump on Sunday attacked several members of the panel taking part in Monday’s hearing, calling Reps. Eric Swalwell of California, Pramila Jayapal of Washington and David Cicilline of Rhode Island “losers and “radical left haters.”

Cicilline, in response to Trump’s tweet, tweeted a selfie of the three of them and Rep. Joe Neguse of Colorado from inside the hearing room where Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee met Saturday and Sunday to prepare for Monday’s hearing.

“While you’re busy tweeting insults, we’re busy working to honor our oath of office to protect and defend the constitution and safeguard our democracy,” Cicilline tweeted.

Jayapal told reporters Sunday that the committee was prepared to hold another hearing this week if the White House planned to present its own case, but because Trump isn’t participating the committee does not expect another hearing.

“We need to listen, we need to go through the hearing tomorrow and see what is said there,” Jayapal said. “We do want to listen to the minority case, the minority’s counsel, we want to make sure we have all that information in front of us, and then once that’s done, we’ll have a good sense of what’s next.”

(© Copyright 2019 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. CNN contributed to this report.)